Teresa Lutz
Earlier in my career, I worked for a utility supporting the design and delivery of energy conservation programs through evaluation and research. At that time, I did not love the evaluation process or the evaluation community. The value of evaluation was a tough sell to my coworkers, and I agreed the evaluation process and results could be better. We wanted more timely feedback, recommendations we could implement, and insight beyond what we already knew. As a consultant, I hold those experiences close. I avoid doing ‘evaluation for evaluation’s sake’. I am fixated on figuring out the Big WHY of what we do, what works and what doesn’t. It is through knowing this that we can improve and prosper in this industry.
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: The Core Principles
The practice of appreciative inquiry highlights the role of group conversations, imaginations, and...
2 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: Destiny
The past several posts of the Big WHY of Evaluation blog have focused on the practice of...
1 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: Design
I have been thinking through how to approach conversations about climate change and its impacts...
2 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: Dream
“Let us make our future now, and let us make our dreams tomorrow's reality.” (Malala Yousafzai)[1]
2 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: Discovery
“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on the solution, I would spend the first...
2 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: It Takes Practice and Persistence
According to the online article Appreciative Inquiry: Igniting Transformative Action[1], we can all...
1 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: Definition
“Questions are fateful. They determine destinations. They are the chamber through which destiny...
3 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry: The Five D's
What if the goal of ‘continuous improvement’ changed to ‘radical innovation’? Would the way in...
2 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
appreciative inquiry,
deficit-based change,
constructionist-based change
Appreciative Inquiry
The climate change alarm has reached a screeching level in the past couple of weeks. As pundits,...
2 minute read
Topics
- actionable intelligence (1)
- after action review (1)
- agriculture (1)
- appreciative inquiry (10)
- arkansas protocol (2)
- ASHRAE Level II Audit (2)
- assessments (1)
- attribution (2)
- barriers (2)
- baseline studies (2)
- baselines (1)
- before action review (1)
- C&I (3)
- carbon emissions (2)
- carbon intensity (3)
- causal diagrams (1)
- causal models (1)
- clean energy (3)
- climate change (6)
- code compliance (2)
- constructionist-based change (10)
- consumption data analysis (1)
- cooling (2)
- customer motivation (1)
- customer recruitment (1)
- data collection (2)
- data collection methods (1)
- data gaps (1)
- data issues (2)
- decarbonization (3)
- deemed savings (1)
- deficit-based change (10)
- DEI (1)
- demand response (1)
- double-counting (1)
- effective useful life (1)
- electric lawn equipment (1)
- electricity (1)
- electrification (7)
- eligible measure (1)
- EM&V (8)
- embedded research and evaluation (27)
- emergent learning frameworks (1)
- emergent learning tables (1)
- energy audit (2)
- energy codes (2)
- energy conversions (1)
- energy efficiency (31)
- energy program (8)
- energy program goals (1)
- equity (1)
- EUL (3)
- evaluation (58)
- evaluation approaches (31)
- evaluation design (1)
- funding (1)
- gender (1)
- gender gaps (1)
- health (1)
- heat pumps (3)
- heating (1)
- implementation research (7)
- inflation reduction act (1)
- installation (1)
- learning logs (1)
- load management (1)
- load shape (1)
- market characterization (1)
- measurement and verification (5)
- negative savings (1)
- non-energy impacts (2)
- ntg (4)
- peak load (1)
- persistence (1)
- process evaluation (2)
- program design (1)
- program evaluation (9)
- program implementation (8)
- program logic model (1)
- program year (1)
- realization rates (1)
- research (58)
- researchable issues (10)
- savings (2)
- solar (2)
- supplemental heating (1)
- the big why (27)
- timing of projects (1)
- tracking methods (1)
- weather (1)