Teresa Lutz
Earlier in my career, I worked for a utility supporting the design and delivery of energy conservation programs through evaluation and research. At that time, I did not love the evaluation process or the evaluation community. The value of evaluation was a tough sell to my coworkers, and I agreed the evaluation process and results could be better. We wanted more timely feedback, recommendations we could implement, and insight beyond what we already knew. As a consultant, I hold those experiences close. I avoid doing ‘evaluation for evaluation’s sake’. I am fixated on figuring out the Big WHY of what we do, what works and what doesn’t. It is through knowing this that we can improve and prosper in this industry.
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
program implementation,
researchable issues,
implementation research,
actionable intelligence
Actionable Intelligence
At the AESP 2019 Annual Conference, I met Carmen Best, a woman I have admired from afar for quite...
2 minute read
the big why,
embedded research and evaluation,
research,
evaluation,
evaluation approaches,
program implementation,
researchable issues,
implementation research
Implementation Research: Explain and Predict
In the last couple of posts, I have written about implementation research as discussed in the...
2 minute read
Topics
- actionable intelligence (1)
- after action review (1)
- agriculture (1)
- appreciative inquiry (10)
- arkansas protocol (2)
- ASHRAE Level II Audit (2)
- assessments (1)
- attribution (2)
- barriers (2)
- baseline studies (2)
- baselines (1)
- before action review (1)
- C&I (3)
- carbon emissions (2)
- carbon intensity (3)
- causal diagrams (1)
- causal models (1)
- clean energy (3)
- climate change (6)
- code compliance (2)
- constructionist-based change (10)
- consumption data analysis (1)
- cooling (2)
- customer motivation (1)
- customer recruitment (1)
- data collection (2)
- data collection methods (1)
- data gaps (1)
- data issues (2)
- decarbonization (3)
- deemed savings (1)
- deficit-based change (10)
- DEI (1)
- demand response (1)
- double-counting (1)
- effective useful life (1)
- electric lawn equipment (1)
- electricity (1)
- electrification (7)
- eligible measure (1)
- EM&V (8)
- embedded research and evaluation (27)
- emergent learning frameworks (1)
- emergent learning tables (1)
- energy audit (2)
- energy codes (2)
- energy conversions (1)
- energy efficiency (31)
- energy program (8)
- energy program goals (1)
- equity (1)
- EUL (3)
- evaluation (58)
- evaluation approaches (31)
- evaluation design (1)
- funding (1)
- gender (1)
- gender gaps (1)
- health (1)
- heat pumps (3)
- heating (1)
- implementation research (7)
- inflation reduction act (1)
- installation (1)
- learning logs (1)
- load management (1)
- load shape (1)
- market characterization (1)
- measurement and verification (5)
- negative savings (1)
- non-energy impacts (2)
- ntg (4)
- peak load (1)
- persistence (1)
- process evaluation (2)
- program design (1)
- program evaluation (9)
- program implementation (8)
- program logic model (1)
- program year (1)
- realization rates (1)
- research (58)
- researchable issues (10)
- savings (2)
- solar (2)
- supplemental heating (1)
- the big why (27)
- timing of projects (1)
- tracking methods (1)
- weather (1)